Skip to content
Get a fee quote

Saving Clause.

Article 1(4) of the US-UK treaty: each country reserves the right to tax its own residents, and the US its citizens, as if the treaty had not come into effect. It is the single most misunderstood sentence in expat tax.

Specialists working through treaty articles

The exceptions are where the relief lives

Because of the saving clause, a US citizen cannot simply claim most treaty benefits against the IRS — the pension article, social security article and a handful of others are specifically excepted, and those exceptions are where real planning happens. Misreading the clause in either direction produces confident, expensive mistakes.

  • Lets the US tax its citizens, and each country its residents, as if the treaty were absent
  • Pension growth and social security provisions survive it
  • Form 8833 discloses positions that rely on the exceptions
Working through the treaty's saving clause exceptions

What survives, paragraph by paragraph

Article 1(5), as replaced by the 2002 protocol, lists the exceptions. For everyone, including citizens, the clause does not affect Article 9(2), Article 17(1)(b), 17(3) and 17(5), Article 18(1) and 18(5), and Articles 24, 25 and 26.

A second list applies only to people who are neither citizens nor green card holders of the country concerned: Article 18(2), and Articles 19, 20, 20A and 28.

Saving clause exceptions under Article 1(5)
ProvisionWhat it coversSurvives for US citizens?
Article 17(1)(b)Pension amounts exempt in the source countryYes
Article 17(3)Social security paid to a resident of the other countryYes
Article 18(1)Growth inside a pension scheme in the other countryYes
Article 18(5)Certain UK pension contributions of US citizens in the UKYes
Article 24Relief from double taxationYes
Article 18(2)Contributions to a scheme in the other countryNo, only for non-citizens
Coordinating treaty relief across both returns

How it plays out in practice

Take American social security paid to a US citizen living in Britain. Article 17(3) allocates it to Britain alone, and because that paragraph survives the saving clause, the IRS cannot tax it. Now take a regular payment from a 401(k): the general pension rule in Article 17(1)(a) is not on the list, so both countries tax it and credits under Article 24 relieve the overlap.

Same person, same treaty, opposite answers. The list decides.

Questions we get about this

No. It removes most treaty benefits for US citizens, but the listed exceptions survive, including relief from double taxation in Article 24, the social security paragraph and important pension paragraphs. Those exceptions are where most cross-border relief for Americans actually comes from.


Yes. Article 1(4) lets each country tax its own residents as if the treaty had not come into effect, and lets the United States also tax its citizens. The citizenship part is what makes the clause so significant for Americans living in Britain.


Article 17(1)(b), which exempts amounts that would be exempt in the source country, and Articles 18(1) and 18(5), covering growth inside schemes in the other country and certain UK contributions of US citizens. The general pension rule and the lump-sum rule do not survive.


Often yes. Treaty-based return positions are generally disclosed on Form 8833, although some are exempt from disclosure. Check whether your position requires it before filing, because the disclosure has its own penalty if missed.

Further reading

Last reviewed . Thresholds and rates change annually — check figures against the current tax year before relying on them.

Want this handled properly?

Describe your situation and we will tell you what is actually required, with a fixed fee to handle it.

Get a fee quote